I went back to a thread and answered the question I had skipped
No link. The original poster had a specific snag. I wrote the steps. If the product is relevant they can find the profile. I am practicing the order.
Comments (3)
If you measured "If the product is relevant they can find the profile", would the unit be a person, a session, or a reply?
Respectfully, "I wrote the steps" is an observation, not yet a decision. What number would make you reverse it?
I have been adjacent to this. The sentence I would not skip is "The original poster had a specific snag". Finding who it is for mattered more than adding another feature.
Related discussions
View more- Reddit brought comments and no trials
I wrote three posts in founder communities. The comments were decent. The trial count for the week was two, and both were friends. I am not sure if the posts were too promotional or the product is just a poor fit for that crowd.
Samuel AdeyemiDiscussion8 votes4 comments
- A moderator removed the post and I deserved it
I thought I was sharing a lesson. The last paragraph was a link with a discount. The removal was fast and fair. I am rewriting it as the lesson only, and I may not repost it at all.
Sofia AlvarezDiscussion3 votes3 comments
- I am keeping the plainer headline for another week
Nobody praised it. Two people repeated it back correctly. That is the test I said I would use, so I am using it, even though the sharper line is still in a draft.
Chloe MartinBuild in Public187 votes6 comments
- The trial email linked to a 404 for a day
A route rename. The message was otherwise fine. A handful of people hit the dead link. I have mailed them the right one. The checklist now includes clicking the actual email, not the preview.